Expert Opinion

Social Media Abuse Can Take Its Toll On Your Lives

With the swarming numbers of social media users across the globe, it is hard to arrive at a certain amount of usage that can inflict your lives. Statisticsays there are more than billions of active users on an everyday basis. It does not end with checking your account on Facebook, and rather it keeps going on and on. There is an endless hunt when it comes to the social media presence. One of the leading marketing analysts, Nicole Behnke puts forth that clutching and glancing the online forum is a constant activity. Nobody has ever made a personal conviction in that regard.

Most often, people keep switching on between Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and other instant messenger sites for every 20 minutes. It has set in a pattern of dependency. When you do not check your accounts, it feels like you are not connected and this is a growing issue among adolescents and young professionals. It is being referred to as an addiction by the health experts. One of the leading specialists of Aurora Health Care, Dr. Munther Barakat, speaks about the 80 percent teens who are already in trouble due to abusive social media use. A majority of the youngsters check their accounts for more than ten times in an hour.

The obsessive patterns of social media usage can lead to anxiety, stress, and depression. Sleep disturbances are found to occur in many. A few of the youngsters also get into social media debates and arguments which can bring about emotional distress. It can also contribute to a significant number of eye-related problems. It is better late than never to safeguard the younger generation. Many get hooked on to social media to kill their boredom. Identifying a good pastime or cultivating a hobby can overcome the monotony in a much better way. It is better to spend a quality time with the family and friends in real environments.

Read Also: Interesting Facts About The Invention Of The Microwave Oven

What Do Scientists Really Think About The Global Warming Phenomenon?

global warming1

For climate scientists who just want the government, any government, to take action on global warming, it is indeed a terrible time. The scandal widely known as Climategate first started at the Copenhagen summit with the exposure of scientific proof that rendered the whole “humans caused global warming” argument moot. While it is true that the public does not place lot of trust in scientists when it comes to the problem that is global warming, the topic has been one of the most widely debated between politicians and scientists alike.

global-warming

While it is true that a very recent IPCC report did state global warming was likely caused by the activity of humans, skeptics argue that even the IPCC is influenced by politics and hitherto unknown agendas. The truth however, is that most scientists are at least as cautious as politicians, if not more, when it comes to announcing a doomsday prophecy regarding global warming. While more than a tenth saw little to no danger in the next 100 years due to the rise in temperature, about 40% foresaw moderate anger while the same percentile saw catastrophic danger in the future too. Interestingly enough, a small percentage of scientists remained undecided on their opinion and declined to answer.

To be fair, the scientists’ genuine responses reflect a certain humility regarding our capacity to correctly predict the future. It also reflects a closer appraisal of the scientific community’s understanding of climate change today. Considering the origins of the debate, this hardly comes as a surprise, in light of the relatively recent origins of this debate. While this doesn’t signify blatant ignorance about climate change and its effects, it does mean more information is required on global warming. Political leaders must strive to acknowledge that science can help them make informed choices on their environmental policies but cannot be pressured to dictate them. As Climategate most glibly revealed, searching for certainty as political cover can surely backfire.